This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
bits/libc-tsd.h, bits/atomic.h and other non-installed headers?
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
- To: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 21:01:24 +0200
- Subject: bits/libc-tsd.h, bits/atomic.h and other non-installed headers?
From BZ #14912:
"In <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-09/msg00305.html>, Roland
notes that the <bits/*.h> naming scheme is generally for installed
headers, and so is confusing for non-installed headers. The following
bits/*.h headers are not installed and should be renamed to reflect
this: bits/atomic.h bits/libc-tsd.h bits/linkmap.h."
Should e.g. bits/libc-tsd.h just be renamed to libc-tsd.h? Or is there
an convention for non-installed headers?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126