This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] en_CA, es_AR, es_ES: Define yesstr and nostr.
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Petr Baudis <pasky at ucw dot cz>
- Cc: libc-locales at sourceware dot org, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 07:49:19 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] en_CA, es_AR, es_ES: Define yesstr and nostr.
- References: <51619965 dot 9030600 at redhat dot com> <20130407210205 dot GX6137 at machine dot or dot cz>
On 04/07/2013 05:02 PM, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 12:05:57PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> My feeling is that this is positive progress on missing data.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> I think it's fine, Acked-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>.
>
> Thank you for the verbose comments. :-)
Checked in as is.
We can handle the "uppercase" vs. "lowercase" first character
in yesstr/nostr as a distinct set of changes since they also
impact en_US.
Right now I'm just trying to add yesstr and nostr to as many
locales as possible.
Cheers,
Carlos.