This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: asm syntax

From: Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal dot cx>
To: Kenneth O'Brien <dev at kenobrien dot org>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:25:46 -0500
Subject: Re: asm syntax
References: <CAJgmeTHB-rR_5eUQ7Xp-eQdCTRiLtWFKbQ85KcLR-Tw_91xr6Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 04:08:13PM +0000, Kenneth O'Brien wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am working on SSE4.2 enchanced string functions. Are there any
> objections to writing new assembly code in Intel syntax over AT&T.
> 
> All current asm(that I've seen) is written in AT&T, but gas supports
> Intel which (IMHO) is friendlier to the programmer.

s/friendlier to the programmer/friendlier to a programmer with a DOS
or Windows background/

Rich

Follow-Ups:
- Re: asm syntax
  - From: Kenneth O'Brien

References:
- asm syntax
  - From: Kenneth O'Brien

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]