This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] [v4] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
Cc: pfrankli at redhat dot com, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:42:25 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [Patch] [v4] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
References: <512B7AE8.4070508@redhat.com><20130225191343.D0AF72C06E@topped-with-meat.com><512BDA8A.1050401@redhat.com><20130225214450.0319F2C06E@topped-with-meat.com><512BDFFC.9060202@redhat.com><20130225231528.88E5F2C06E@topped-with-meat.com><512D0714.3090707@redhat.com><20130226191117.25C962C074@topped-with-meat.com><512E5EDE.2050405@redhat.com>

> Given that you added AT_EACCESS in 2006, would you be opposed to
> me trying to push that constant into the Linux kernel so that we
> avoid any potential future overlap?

I certainly don't object to Linux implementing a first-class method to
implement POSIX.1-2008-conformant faccessat.

References:
- [Patch] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
  - From: Patsy Franklin
- Re: [Patch] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
  - From: Roland McGrath
- [Patch] [v2] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
  - From: Patsy Franklin
- Re: [Patch] [v2] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
  - From: Roland McGrath
- [Patch] [v3] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
  - From: Patsy Franklin
- Re: [Patch] [v3] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
  - From: Roland McGrath
- [Patch] [v4] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
  - From: Patsy Franklin
- Re: [Patch] [v4] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [Patch] [v4] Add Comment to io/fcntl.h
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]