This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: support for calling Linux syscalls directly
On 02/04/2013 09:52 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Rich Felker <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:01:27 -0500
>> I'm largely against libinux. There does not seem to be any compelling
>> reason for making a new library to hold 500 bytes of syscall wrapper
>> code, and I agree the distinction of what goes there versus libc seems
>> arbitrary and confusing.
> This is my position as well, we should just put all the syscall stubs
> in libc.
After seeing the list, I do agree that the case for libinux seems pretty
weak. I don't have a strong opinion on glibc vs libinux, I just want to
get rid of syscall(3).