This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> writes:Most definitely, it is wrong. It built, but I had interrupted the testing process to add another unrelated change. That's my bad.
You're still missing my point.
No, I don't. Your patch is just wrong. I wonder how you tested it.
If it's just convention, then we need to make it a strict policy. I'm fine with that.
Every architecture that currently implements pointer mangling has function addresses aligned to some boundary (even if only by convention).
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |