This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: punt HAVE_CPP_ASM_DEBUGINFO

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 14:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: punt HAVE_CPP_ASM_DEBUGINFO
References: <1344799680-19443-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org><CAMe9rOq=E9iwNn+N0_oM-pGXUtyhT66xWoX=MEZW=TcgJrwW3Q@mail.gmail.com><CAMe9rOoAONzUrGxyquT2mxZz5fmp7C0=nMmnCTX_pN_Y9F4euw@mail.gmail.com>

That looks exactly right.  Thanks for following up.  Someone certainly
should have thought to verify that assembly code line info was indeed still
generated when this change was first posted for review.  I suppose we could
have a regression test using nm and addr2line on some chosen .o files or
something (if CFLAGS contains -g%).


Thanks,
Roland

References:
- Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: punt HAVE_CPP_ASM_DEBUGINFO
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: punt HAVE_CPP_ASM_DEBUGINFO
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]