This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] S/390: Fix two issues with the IFUNC optimized mem* routines


On 29/08/12 13:05, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:44:21 Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the attached patch fixes two problems with the S/390 IFUNC
>> optimization of the mem* functions:
>>
>> 1. In the current implementation the resolver functions reside in a
>> different file than the CPU optimized versions.  This requires an
>> R_390_RELATIVE runtime relocation to be generated when the resolver
>> returns the function pointers. This caused a bug with GCJ. libgcj
>> calls memcpy via function pointer (R_390_GLOB_DAT).  This relocation
>> is resolved at load time of libgcj.  The dynamic linker in that case
>> called the memcpy resolver inside Glibc *before* glibc has been
>> relocated causing the resolver to return a bogus value.
>>
>> This perhaps could also be fixed in the dynamic linker by calling the
>> ifunc resolvers only in a second pass over all the relocations?!
> 
> Could this also be an issue on other architectures like x86-64? I had a 
> few strange bugreports with LD_BIND_NOW=1 in kde that were impossible to 
> debug but seemed to involve multiarch functions,

Not for the Glibc functions I think. The resolver functions for x86_64 use lea to load the
address of the optimized functions. This works without generating runtime relocations.
Another reason is that, according to H.J.Lu, Glibc on x86_64 is always forced to be loaded
first so it wouldn't even be a problem if the resolvers would need runtime relocations.

However, I think this is a general problem which might very well occur with other shared
objects defining IFUNC optimized routines. Forcing IFUNC resolvers to never generate any
runtime relocations to me appears like a rather non-obvious limitation.

Please see the following example on x86-64. The example works fine after making a1 static:

a.c:
#include <stdio.h>

void a (int) __attribute__((ifunc ("resolve_a")));

void a1 (int i)
{
  printf("%d\n", i + 1);
}

void (*resolve_a (void)) (int)
{
  return &a1;
}

b.c:
extern void a (int);

void (*ap) (int) = a;

void
b (int i)
{
  ap (i + 1);
}

main.c:
extern void b (int);

int
main ()
{
  b (1);
}

gcc -shared -fpic a.c -o liba.so
gcc -shared -fpic b.c -o libb.so

gcc -o main main.c -L./ -lb -la
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./
$ ./main
3

gcc -o main main.c -L./ -la -lb
$ ./main
Segmentation fault


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]