This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I've fixed the sinf and cosf x86_64 patch according to requests below and reattach it. And yes, I intend to provide SSE optimized sincos in couple weeks for the patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-06/msg00692.html Change log is the same: 2012-08-13 Liubov Dmitrieva <liubov.dmitrieva@gmail.com> * sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_sinf.S New file. * sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/s_cosf.S New file. * sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/libm-test-ulps Update. -- Liubov Dmitrieva Intel Corporation 2012/8/9 Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>: > On 2012.08.09 at 10:39 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> On Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:16:06 Dmitrieva Liubov wrote: >> > Repost of the patch with opimized SINF and COSF for x86_64. >> > >> > http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-06/msg00692.html >> > >> > We are looking forward to accepting and releasing this. >> >> Btw. if you could look at this bugreport as well and provide an >> optimized sincos implementation, it would be appreciated: >> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14412 >> >> Just a few comments on your submission: >> >> * Please add a copyright header. >> * Instead of defining EDOM, I suggest to: >> #include <bits/errno.h> >> >> * For your comments, follow the usual style - with two spaces after "." >> or "?" - and no space before > > Also ASM_TYPE_DIRECTIVE{,_PREFIX} was removed a few days ago (commit > b67e9372b28ef33). Please use ".type L(FOO),@object" instead. > > -- > Markus
Attachment:
sinf_cosf_x86_64.patch
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |