This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Testing 2.16 release candidate with gnulib
On 6/29/2012 7:25 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012, Bruno Haible wrote:
>
>> [Carlos sent me the configuration results of testing a gnulib testdir
>> with a glibc 2.16 release candidate on x86_64.]
>
> These look like there was a problem in how the testing was done, so tests
> did not actually run with the new library, but with an older system
> library. Did the link lines actually include -rpath and -dynamic-linker
> options with the directory names spelt exactly right? Do the tests (as
> run with strace) really use the newly built libraries?
You are correct.
In my haste I misconfigured gnulib.
I've sent Bruno the *correct* set of configure logs which match my initial
posted list of failures.
The only unaccounted problems have to do with using -lm to link logf and log10f.
Cheers,
Carlos.
--
Carlos O'Donell
Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
carlos_odonell@mentor.com
carlos@codesourcery.com
+1 (613) 963 1026