This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 05/24/2012 08:11 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:Ping, what should be done with these two patches?
Your email had just one patch, which unfortunately was incorrect because it has no effect even on hypothetical hosts with 128-bit size_t, as its expression ((uint64_t) len>> 63>> 1) is always zero.
I just now attached a corrected sha512.c patch to the report for bug#14090. The two non-obsolete patches that are now attached to that bug report should both be applied, though I hope somebody can test them first -- I haven't even compiled them, much less tested them.
Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |