This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH [3/n]: Add __snseconds_t and __SNSECONDS_T_TYPE


On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>> Linux/x32 uses long long for time_t. timespec has
>>
>> struct timespec
>> ? {
>> ? ? __time_t tv_sec; ? ? ? ? ?/* Seconds. ?*/
>> ? ? long int tv_nsec; ? ? ? ? /* Nanoseconds. ?*/
>> ? };
>>
>> Linux/x32 uses the same timespec as x86-64 inside kernel. That means
>> tv_nsec must also be 64bit for Linux/x32. However, we don't have
>> __snseconds_t. ?This patch defines time_t to 64bit and adds __snseconds_t
>> similar to __suseconds_t.
>
> That's fine, but it's its own one change to start using that and
> a separate change to add sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/bits/typesizes.h
> afterwards.
>
>> This patch defines __SSYSCALL_LONG_TYPE and __USYSCALL_LONG_TYPE to
>
> That doesn't belong in the __snseconds_t patch.
>
>> struct ipc_perm
>> ? {
>> ? ? __key_t __key; ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* Key. ?*/
>> ? ? __uid_t uid; ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* Owner's user ID. ?*/
>> ? ? __gid_t gid; ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/* Owner's group ID. ?*/
>> ? ? __uid_t cuid; ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* Creator's user ID. ?*/
>> ? ? __gid_t cgid; ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* Creator's group ID. ?*/
>> ? ? unsigned short int mode; ? ? ? ? ?/* Read/write permission. ?*/
>> ? ? unsigned short int __pad1;
>> ? ? unsigned short int __seq; ? ? ? ? /* Sequence number. ?*/
>> ? ? unsigned short int __pad2;
>> ? ? __USYSCALL_LONG_TYPE __unused1;
>> ? ? __USYSCALL_LONG_TYPE __unused2;
>> ? };
>
> Definitions like this shouldn't use __*_TYPE macros at all.
> They should use typedefs instead.
>

I will refactor my patches and resubmit them.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]