This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: glibc-2.8 tarballs?


On Tue, 20 May 2008 22:19:31 +0100 (BST)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 May 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> > I think there is more of a need than that around the "release"
> > process.  Making a single release tarball is great for release
> > boundaries, but if nobody is actively maintaining the branch in CVS
> > it's sort of pointless.
> 
>  Distributors (as well as whoever is interested in) will cherry-pick and
> back-port changes they deem important from the mainline anyway.  Some

If distros X, Y, and Z all have a particular patch applied, wouldn't
that be an indicator that it might be important enough to actually
bring back into the release branch?  Seems it would be at least a good
conversation point.

That sort of activity is what I meant by maintaining.  I wasn't
intending to imply that known critical fixes are being ignored.

josh


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]