This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Bruno Haible <bruno at clisp dot org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba dot org>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, bug-gnulib at gnu dot org, Jim Meyering <jim at meyering dot net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:25:54 -0700
Subject: Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?
References: <87y7ixb6wb.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <18023.14974.850789.281193@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <466742C2.2050504@redhat.com> <200706070409.06567.bruno@clisp.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bruno Haible wrote:
> The crash also occurs on i386 platforms, e.g. CPUs built by AMD.

Bullshit.  Those CPU never produce such numbers.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGZ2yy2ijCOnn/RHQRAoL1AJ9nSmjSXGC7JoOBVIl/gUxh7Aos+wCgmBvE
WWWjRjBy7IcVFGY/KE6OADc=
=NwJm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?
  - From: Jim Meyering
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?
  - From: Paul Mackerras
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?
  - From: Bruno Haible

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]