This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Dear devs, I and some other users who have been trying some glibc snapshots (see http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-435659-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-25.html ) are experiencing major performance problems on x86 and x86_64 with a sat solver. I don't know whether we do something wrong (it is not vanilla snapshot, as it incorporates several patches) or it is something in glibc. (It is not compiler dependant, but strangely enough with dynamically linked exes - if compiled on machine with stable glibc, the speed is ok on machine with snapshot glibc. Even if I compile the source to an object on the stable glibc machine, and link on the snapshot machine, speed is ok. But vice-versa, speed is slow. So a problem in the headers?) Perhaps you just want to check yourself. I uploaded sources and properly working static binaries here: http://punnoor.de/various/boehm-sat.tar.bz2 Just run runme10.sh for a quick or runme.sh for a thourough test. The last lines of each run will show you cumulative run-times (so lower is better). In the runme10.sh test I get about 20 sec run-time with stable glibc and about 30 secs with the snapshot. I am not subscribed, so please cc me. Thanks for your time, -- (°= =°) //\ Prakash Punnoor /\\ V_/ \_V
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |