This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: trouble building glibc-2.3.2/gcc-3.4.0/sparc64 with cvsbinutils
- From: Rene Rebe <rene at rocklinux-consulting dot de>
- To: dank at kegel dot com
- Cc: hjl at lucon dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com, vanl at megsinet dot net,rock-devel at rocklinux dot org
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 14:55:48 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: trouble building glibc-2.3.2/gcc-3.4.0/sparc64 with cvsbinutils
- References: <4095D06B.7090708@kegel.com><20040503051825.GA14673@lucon.org><40965A10.2050107@kegel.com>
Hi,
On: Mon, 03 May 2004 07:41:20 -0700,
Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
> > Can you try glibc from CVS? I couldn't find how it could wind up in
> > dl-reloc.o.
>
> I just did, and now it fails with
>
> .../sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_eh
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [.../sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-3.4.0-glibc-20040501/build-glibc/libc.so] Error 1
>
> Anyone know why the patch at the end of the thread
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-09/msg00100.html didn't go in?
> I don't know how one bootstraps glibc if it requires -lgcc_eh.
>
> Maybe I'll go back to glibc-2.3.2 and try to follow Jakub's hint:
The same happened during updating the glibc to 2.3.4-cvs in ROCK
Linux, too. I also created the same "fix" or "solution" (however you
want to name it) independently. I also wonder why it is not in CVS.
Sincerely yours,
René Rebe
- ROCK Linux stable release maintainer
--
René Rebe - Europe/Germany/Berlin
rene@rocklinux.org rene@rocklinux-consulting.de
http://www.rocklinux.org http://www.rocklinux-consulting.de