This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [glibc-HEAD (2.3.3)] - Problem with NPTL and Bind 9.2.3
- From: Denis Zaitsev <zzz at anda dot ru>
- To: Shawn Starr <shawn dot starr at rogers dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 07:32:06 +0500
- Subject: Re: [glibc-HEAD (2.3.3)] - Problem with NPTL and Bind 9.2.3
- References: <000001c3d2f5$4430b890$030aa8c0@panic>
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 02:02:14PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> When attempting to use threads with BIND 9.2.3, bind quits with a
> fatal error. Recompiling BIND 9.2.3 w/o threads works.
> There seems to be problems with heap and NPTL ? Others have told me
> NPTL in RedHat's glibc works fine. However, I am using my own
> Pure-LFS and this fails for me.
A similar problems exist when GLIBC is configured with --enable-omitfp
and then compiled with GCC 3.x. It's because their
__builtin_frame_address don't behave correctly with
--fomit-frame-pointer option. And the threads library becomes broken.
So, may be your case looks alike? But I don't understand - what NPTL
do you mean? That one from the GLIBC distribution?