This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] dl-sysdep missing symbols


todays cvs head build fails for PPC64

../sysdeps/generic/dl-sysdep.c:198: error: structure has no member named
`_dl_sysinfo_dso'
../sysdeps/generic/dl-sysdep.c:199: error: structure has no member named
`_dl_sysinfo'

The problem seems that PPC/PPC64 does not need dl_sysinfo and does NOT
__ASSUME_VSYSCALL. So the #ifndef in generic/dl-sysdep.c (see below) is
inverted (should be #ifdef).

#ifndef __ASSUME_VSYSCALL
  /* Only set the sysinfo value if we also have the vsyscall DSO.  */
  if (GL(dl_sysinfo_dso) != 0)
    GL(dl_sysinfo) = new_sysinfo;
#endif

So the attached patch inverts the __ASSUME_VSYSCALL conditional and compiles
correctly.

2003-07-02  Steven Munroe  <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com>

	* sysdeps/generic/dl-sysdep.c (_dl_sysdep_start) [__ASSUME_VSYSCALL]:
	Invert conditional for dl_sysinfo_dso test.
-- 
Steven Munroe
sjmunroe@us.ibm.com
Linux on PowerPC-64 Development
GLIBC for PowerPC-64 Development
diff -urN libc23-cvstip-20030702/sysdeps/generic/dl-sysdep.c libc23/sysdeps/generic/dl-sysdep.c
--- libc23-cvstip-20030702/sysdeps/generic/dl-sysdep.c	2003-07-02 03:48:25.000000000 -0500
+++ libc23/sysdeps/generic/dl-sysdep.c	2003-07-02 10:32:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
     GL(dl_pagesize) = __getpagesize ();
 #endif
 
-#ifndef __ASSUME_VSYSCALL
+#ifdef __ASSUME_VSYSCALL
   /* Only set the sysinfo value if we also have the vsyscall DSO.  */
   if (GL(dl_sysinfo_dso) != 0)
     GL(dl_sysinfo) = new_sysinfo;

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]