This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: A symbol version bug

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 09:33:43 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: A symbol version bug
References: <200305150325.XAA87444@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <200305150439.AAA91337@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <200305150555.BAA91825@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <200305150639.CAA88905@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:39:44AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> HJ,
>    I am able to build glibc cvs (without the base patch) using a
> stock debian binutils 2.14.90.0.1 (without the bfd-base patch).
> The resulting glibc passes make check fine (and vismain.out in
> particular). So it seems to me that we may need binutils cvs
> for these two patches to work. Could you roll a test binutils
> release from current binutils cvs? I'll test that tomorrow 
> using both of the patches again to see if the vismain.out test
> still fails. Thanks in advance.

Ooops. Here is the new symbol version patch. Please try this one.


H.J.

Attachment: libc-base.patch
Description: Text document

References:
- re: PATCH: A symbol version bug
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: PATCH: A symbol version bug
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]