This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 22:59:05 -0800
Subject: Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <20030102151735.GH628@bogon.ms20.nix> <200301040638.57935@enzo.bigblue.local> <3E167588.5030701@redhat.com> <200301040722.34108@enzo.bigblue.local>

Franz Sirl wrote:

> Hmm, looks like a problem in the build process then. libc.so doesn't call 
> __pthread_initialize_minimal@plt anywhere.

libc.so doesn't call it.  libpthread.so does, of course only when it's
loaded.

-- 
--------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------

References:
- is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
  - From: Guido Guenther
- Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: is sysdep-cancel.h needed for any linux arch?
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]