This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
glibc-2.2.94 libc-symbols.h typo?
- From: Glen Nakamura <glen at imodulo dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:11:17 -1000
- Subject: glibc-2.2.94 libc-symbols.h typo?
Aloha,
The tarball for glibc-2.2.94 didn't build on alphaev56-pc-linux.
I lost the original error message, but it was something about redefining
the __hidden_def1 macro. Perhaps a typo in libc-symbols.h?
Testing w/ the appended patch... I'm not sure if it does the right thing,
but it matches the form of the preceding #if block.
-glen
Index: libc-symbols.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/include/libc-symbols.h,v
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -3 -p -r1.43 libc-symbols.h
--- libc-symbols.h 18 Sep 2002 00:14:52 -0000 1.43
+++ libc-symbols.h 19 Sep 2002 22:00:48 -0000
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@
ASM_GLOBAL_DIRECTIVE C_SYMBOL_DOT_NAME (alias) ASM_LINE_SEP \
C_SYMBOL_DOT_NAME (alias) = C_SYMBOL_DOT_NAME (original)
# else
-# define __hidden_def1(original, alias)
+# define __hidden_dot_def1(original, alias)
# endif
# endif
# define __hidden_def2(...) #__VA_ARGS__