This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Results with glibc-2.2.92
- From: Frédéric L. W. Meunier <0 at pervalidus dot net>
- To: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 19:34:55 -0300 (BRT)
- Subject: Re: Results with glibc-2.2.92
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>
> > 2.2.92 was compiled with GCC 3.2.
> >
> > Is the size expected ?
> >
> > libc.so 11023486
> > libc-2.2.5.so 5000557
>
> Use the size command. I get for the last 2.2.5 version from Red Hat:
>
> 1227209 19300 16832 1263341 1346ed /lib/i686/libc.so.6
1136209 23016 16608 1175833 11f119 /lib/libc.so.6
> With the new code in our most recent beta release:
>
> 1130811 17740 17700 1166251 11cbab /lib/i686/libc.so.6
1097503 18300 17668 1133471 114b9f libc.so
> I.e., glibc 2.3 is about 100k smaller. This is with a
> different compiler and a lot of internal optimization and
> despite of adding more functionality.
OK. BTW, what will happen to 2.2.6 ? A maintenance release ? I
read something on the libc-hackers archives.