This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: errno assignment problems

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: jakub at redhat dot com
Cc: roland at redhat dot com, drepper at redhat dot com, aoliva at redhat dot com, bruno at clisp dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 04:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: errno assignment problems
References: <orfzx0nzmv.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20020828030747.8B3421B9D7@perdition.linnaean.org><20020828125321.I1013@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

   From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
   Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:53:21 +0200

   What to do on SPARC is really unclear, as ENOMEDIUM
   is generated by the kernel a lot - either we use a different value for
   ECANCELED, or live with it being the same value as ENOMEDIUM.

I belive it needs to be different from ENOMEDIUM.  What if
some day AIO is possible on a device which can generate
ENOMEDIUM?

References:
- Re: ECANCELED, errlist.c (was Re: FreeBSD port (11): a new errno)
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: ECANCELED, errlist.c (was Re: FreeBSD port (11): a new errno)
  - From: Roland McGrath
- errno assignment problems (was Re: ECANCELED, errlist.c (was Re: FreeBSD port (11): a new errno))
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]