This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: HAVE_HIDDEN doesnt always mean DONT_USE_BOOTSTRAP_MAP
- From: "Steve Munroe" <sjmunroe at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, geoffk at geoffk dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com, roland at frob dot com
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:35:33 -0500
- Subject: Re: HAVE_HIDDEN doesnt always mean DONT_USE_BOOTSTRAP_MAP
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> "Steve Munroe" <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com> writes:
> > However I suspect that use of #ifdefs for architectures is not always a
> > sin. Two examples come to mind:
> >
> > ./stdlib/longlong.h
>
> That one comes from libgmp and is copied.
>
> > ./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/kernel-features.h
>
> And that's the only exception.
>
> >
> > Then there are the various forms of wordsize.h on architectures that
> > support both 32- and 64-bit. How else will __WORDSIZE get set
correctly?
> >
> >
> > Are these the only exceptions?
>
> Yes, they are.
And how about ./elf/cache.c
If I am going to hell I just want to make sure it is for sins I actually
committed ;)