This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: HAVE_HIDDEN doesnt always mean DONT_USE_BOOTSTRAP_MAP
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- To: Steve Munroe <sjmunroe at vnet dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com, geoffk at geoffk dot org, roland at frob dot com
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:25:28 -0700
- Subject: Re: HAVE_HIDDEN doesnt always mean DONT_USE_BOOTSTRAP_MAP
- References: <200208261703.g7QH3Zb09699@brule.rchland.ibm.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Munroe wrote:
HAVE_HIDDEN does not necessarily mean that it is safe to access static
storage during the bootstrap relocation of the loader (rtld.c in _dl-start).
I think you've been told numerous times that using #ifs to test for
architectures is wrong. Not only this, it's the single biggest sin. If
you continue to submit such crap I'll simply ignore everything you send.
And there are other "minor" issues like:
- - the patch is completely out-of-data and unnecessary anyhow
- - you still haven't corrected the ChangeLog format despite being told to
- --
- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE9amSI2ijCOnn/RHQRAtOmAJ9v48N5ce+K3Mhnq171tMEkmdDfkgCfccqv
sle+sjNxGQWRhypSrBWl/us=
=RQGL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----