This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PowerPC64 port part 4 of 7


Ulrich Drepper wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Steve Munroe wrote:
>
> > Have you looked at the whole set? It is all separated out. That is why
> > there are 7 parts!
>
> Oh yeah?
>
>         * sysdeps/powerpc/elf/libc-start.c : Scan Aux Vector for
>         AT_DCACHEBSIZE and copy value to __cache_line_size.
>         * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/dl-sysdep.c : Scan Aux Vector for
>         AT_DCACHEBSIZE and copy value to __cache_line_size.
>         * sysdeps/powerpc/ppc32/memset.S : Define __cache_line_size and use
>         its value to select the correct stride for dcbz.
>         * sysdeps/powerpc/ppc64/memset.S : Define __cache_line_size and use
>         its value to select the correct stride for dcbz.
>
> And this is only from part 4.  I haven't even looked further.
>
> > Are there specific non-powerpc parts you find problematic?
>
> Any change to generic code is suspicous by default.  You have to justify
> each and every one of them.

The memset patch should have been in a month ago as it was posted to the
libc-alpha list early in July!  That fixes a problem which has been a constant
thorn in the PPC backside for a LOOOOOOONNNNNNNGGGGGGGG time.

Any particular reason why that wasn't accepted?

Regards,

Tom

--
Tom Gall - [Embedded] [ppc|ppc64]  Code Monkey
Peace, Love and Linux Technology Center "Where's the ka-boom?
(h) tgall@rochcivictheatre.org           supposed to be an earth
(w) tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com                shattering ka-boom!"
(w) 507-253-4558                         -- Marvin Martian
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]