This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 05:57, Franz Sirl wrote: > I guess, probably semctl.c should be > rewritten to only do va_arg if the IPC code needs the 4th argument. Contributions welcome. > Also there seem to be way to many semctl.c in the tree, why do we have a > lot of linux/<cpu>/semctl.c including linux/i386/semctl.c when there is a > generic linux/semctl.c? The kernel side is a mess with differences among the architectures which make it hard to have a single, optimized user-level implementation. If you want to take a look at this you're welcome. But be aware that each implementation should be at least as efficient at runtime as the current code. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |