This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_remainder.c broken?

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: moshier at moshier dot ne dot mediaone dot net, libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Date: 27 Nov 2001 00:07:14 -0800
Subject: Re: Is sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_remainder.c broken?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0111242113280.13575-100000@moshier.ne.mediaone.net><m3667w6etj.fsf@myware.mynet> <20011127000002.A20476@lucon.org>
Reply-to: drepper at redhat dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

"H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> Ok, the IBM code doesn't work on x86.

I don't know whether it doesn't work at all.  I never tested it with
64-bit mode.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

References:
- Is sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_remainder.c broken?
  - From: Stephen L Moshier
- Re: Is sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_remainder.c broken?
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Is sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_remainder.c broken?
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]