This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Export _Unwind_Find_FDE from glibc (GCC 3.0.1 vs GLIBC 2.2.4 solution part)

To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export _Unwind_Find_FDE from glibc (GCC 3.0.1 vs GLIBC 2.2.4 solution part)
From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 12:39:06 -0700
Cc: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, drepper at redhat dot com, kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <20010719071050.F3862@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <01072120451100.01398@enzo.bigblue.local> <20010722183746.U821@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 06:37:46PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> unwind-dw2.o should not make it into libc.so, but apparently something (most
> probably unwind-dw2-fde.o) drags it in.

It's almost certainly base_of_encoded_value from unwind-pe.h,
which is not actually used in unwind-dw2-fde.c.  Some of the
other routines from that header are though.

r~

References:
- [PATCH] Export _Unwind_Find_FDE from glibc (GCC 3.0.1 vs GLIBC 2.2.4 solution part)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Export _Unwind_Find_FDE from glibc (GCC 3.0.1 vs GLIBC 2.2.4 solution part)
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: [PATCH] Export _Unwind_Find_FDE from glibc (GCC 3.0.1 vs GLIBC 2.2.4 solution part)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]