This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: PR review for 2.2.4: #1974
- To: Torsten dot Duwe at caldera dot de
- Subject: Re: PR review for 2.2.4: #1974
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:58:32 +0200
- Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <20010215094356.A3353@valinux.com> <14989.24250.474023.584488@ns.caldera.de> <20010216091332.A20320@valinux.com> <15124.54408.572938.625919@ns.caldera.de> <m3snhnjdf7.fsf@D139.suse.de> <15124.56194.583339.568099@ns.caldera.de> <m3y9rfhxd2.fsf@D139.suse.de> <15132.43389.624130.144004@ns.caldera.de> <u8r8wz5ami.fsf@gromit.moeb> <15133.60192.604637.814556@ns.caldera.de>
- Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 10:34:40AM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>
> Andreas> To get 2.2.4 out of the door we need some help with GNATS first.
> Andreas> Anybody looking through the reports and telling me what to do
> Andreas> with them is welcome!
>
> [http://bugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl requires _netscape_ & cookies --
> sheesh !]
>
> OK, here's my first one: #1974 "Installed glibc-2.2 and can no longer use g++"
>
> Indeed this is due to a change in glibc. However, since those changes usually
> are made for good, we at Caldera decided to sync up our gcc. Can some of you
> Cygnus folks eval and short circuit this to a gcc maintainer and close the
> PR? Is it in a CVS branch of gcc already ?
This is not the only patch you need to get 2.95.2 cope with glibc 2.2.
Basically, you need gcc 2.95.3 + patches, CVS gcc-2_95-branch,
gcc-2.96-RH or gcc 3.0+ for glibc 2.2+.
Jakub