This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

recommended versions, patches?


I'm trying to normalize the GNU portions of our company's
development environment as much as I can, and as a starting point,
I'm trying to determine what the right versions of GCC and GLIBC are.
I'd like to be using "sanctioned" releases (assuming these are the most
robust, reliable, etc.), and today that points to
gcc 2.95.3 and glibc 2.2.3.

>From threads in this mailing list, it appears that this combination is
a problem, and that at least some patches must be made to gcc 2.95.3
to work with glibc 2.2.3, something about an unversioned atexit symbol.
Is this the only problem with the above combo?  Are there other "must
fix" things to get them to work well together?

thanks,
   Ken

--
Ken Whaley
ken@believe.com <mailto:ken@believe.com>

This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact
the sender and delete all copies.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]