This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: localedata/locales/iso14651_t1 problem?
- To: drepper at redhat dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
- Subject: Re: localedata/locales/iso14651_t1 problem?
- From: GOTO Masanori <gotom at debian dot org>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 15:57:13 +0900
- Cc: GOTO Masanori <gotom at debian dot org>,libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <wtwhez07qlr.wl@fe.dis.titech.ac.jp><m38zkbgfvg.fsf@otr.mynet>
At 05 May 2001 23:18:11 -0700,
Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > > % LANG=en_US ls -a
> > > . file2vZuoT filevijr0k ssh-XXOKiPLN texMSudLt .X11-unix
> > > .. filennXKNi .font-unix texaZj9oc .X0-lock .xf86config20364
> >
> > (This version of "ls" is locale sensitive)
> > Above is correct behavior. But, users want below behavior like:
> >
> > > % LANG=en_US ls -a
> > > . .X0-lock .font-unix file2vZuoT filevijr0k texMSudLt
> > > .. .X11-unix .xf86config20364 filennXKNi ssh-XXOKiPLN texaZj9oc
>
> Then let those people use LC_ALL=C. You have to learn to
> differentiate between the assumptions made by people who used
> non-i18n-ized systems and the assumptions a neutral (or new) user has.
> The first output is what everybody in the second camp expects since
> this is how a dictionary is ordered.
Do you think iso14651_t1 reached to use?
It has been approved and is under publication,
so it's only in beta stage, IMHO.
-- GOTO Masanori