This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: regex.c is not 64bit clean


On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 11:38:12AM +0900, Isamu Hasegawa wrote:
> Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
> > code: you are storing a pointer in the wchar_t array.
> 
> I'm ashamed of such a stupid bug...
> How about the following patch?
> 
> However I fear that my assumption might be incorrect.
> I think the index of the _NL_COLLATE_SYMB_EXTRAMB table is
> not more than wchar_t.  Is this assumption true?
> 

regex still doesn't work on my ia64. It failed at test

{0, "[[:digit:]]+", "01234"},

But it may be kernel related. I will check it out tomorrow.

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]