This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.1.1pre2 breaks libstdc++-v3 build
- To: drepper at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.1.1pre2 breaks libstdc++-v3 build
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 17:27:30 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
> From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
>
> "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
>
> > As I mentioned in my last message, you can capture the definition of a
> > macro inside an inline function:
>
> No, you cannot. A macro definition can vary in different compilation
> runs.
That inline function is tacked onto stdio.h by fixincl. So it gets
interpreted on every compilation run too.
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi Engagement Manager / Project Services
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Internet Solutions