This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.1.1pre2 breaks libstdc++-v3 build
- To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.1.1pre2 breaks libstdc++-v3 build
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- Date: 11 Jan 2001 14:03:40 -0800
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <200101112128.QAA27569@caip.rutgers.edu>
- Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
"Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
> As I mentioned in my last message, you can capture the definition of a
> macro inside an inline function:
No, you cannot. A macro definition can vary in different compilation
runs.
--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------