This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

glibc compile fails on x86, too, also in csu


>Submitter-Id:	net
>Originator:	
>Organization:
 
>Confidential:	no
>Synopsis:	"invalid character '_' in opcode"
>Severity:	critical
>Priority:	high
>Category:	libc
>Class:		diff bug?!
>Release:	libc-2.1.96
>Environment:
	
Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu
System: Linux hellhound 2.4.0-test9 #6 Fri Oct 6 18:15:01 CEST 2000 i686 unknown
Architecture: i686

Addons: linuxthreads
Build CFLAGS: -pipe -Os
Build CC: gcc
Compiler version: 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
Kernel headers: 2.4.0-test9
Symbol versioning: yes
Build static: yes
Build shared: yes
Build pic-default: no
Build profile: yes
Build omitfp: no
Build bounded: no
Build static-nss: no
Stdio: libio

>Description:

This is the line that failed:

  ASM_GLOBAL_DIRECTIVE __errno     ; >----__errno     = _errno······

>How-To-Repeat:
	get glibc-2.1.95 tarball, get glibc-2.1.95-2.1.96.diff.bz2,
	apply it, untar glibc-linuxthreads-2.1.96 and run configure
	--prefix=/usr --enable-add-ons.

	Now that it also happened on native x86, I'd say that the diff
	seems to be broken and I will download the complete 2.1.96
	tarball.  Can someone else please cross-check the diff?
>Fix:
	

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]