This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFC] IPC64 with glibc-2.2 and linux-2.4

To: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] IPC64 with glibc-2.2 and linux-2.4
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 25 Sep 2000 09:08:37 -0700
Cc: libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com, linuxppc-dev at lists dot linuxppc dot org
References: <Franz Sirl's message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2000 11:10:45 +0200"> <FranzSirl's message of "Sun, 24 Sep 2000 21:50:44 +0200"><00092421504403.01070@enzo.bigblue.local><5.0.0.19.2.20000925110119.01fe1df0@mail.lauterbach.com><5.0.0.19.2.20000925173113.02e31040@mail.lauterbach.com>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:

> Well, changing compared to what? IPC_64 on PPC was never functional
> so far, so there is no problem here. The IPC_64 structs on the other
> archs have this, eg on sparc:

I'm failing to see where you want to see ipc_perm64 included in the
compilation environment unless you replace ipc_perm.  There are no LFS
variants for the SysV IPC functions.  And then ipc_perm64 should be
the same size as ipc_perm.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

References:
- [RFC] IPC64 with glibc-2.2 and linux-2.4
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: [RFC] IPC64 with glibc-2.2 and linux-2.4
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: [RFC] IPC64 with glibc-2.2 and linux-2.4
  - From: Franz Sirl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]