This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.1.94 testing on alpha
- To: Christian Iseli <chris at ludwig-alpha dot unil dot ch>
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.1.94 testing on alpha
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Date: 22 Sep 2000 09:34:14 +0200
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <200009220707.JAA12205@ludwig-alpha.unil.ch>
>>>>> Christian Iseli writes:
> aj@suse.de said:
>> Let's fix __printf_fphex () first - and then send the ulps file.
> Ok, I've recompiled with "-O2 -g -mcpu=ev56". It still doesn't SEGFAULT, but
> the output is "interesting"... For example, from test-float:
> testing float (without inline functions)
> Failure: Test: frexp (12.8, &x) == 0.8
> Result:
> is: 1.28000001907348632812e+01 0x1.99999a0000000Äùp^B^@^@^@p+3
> should be: 8.00000011920928955078e-01 0x1.99999a0000000Äùp^B^@^@^@p-1
> difference: 1.20000000000000000000e+01 0x1.8000000000000Äùp^B^@^@^@p+3
> ulp : 201326592.0000
> max.ulp : 0.0000
> ... (more similar failures...)
> What do you think ?
Sorry, I don't have time to check the printf_fphex routine - and don't
know enough about the alpha to make a good guess.
Alpha developers, please have a look at this!
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj