This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: glibc 2.1.92 compatibility with glibc 2.1.3 ?

To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks at ivey dot uwo dot ca>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.1.92 compatibility with glibc 2.1.3 ?
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 15 Aug 2000 14:41:03 -0700
Cc: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot med dot uc dot edu>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008142321530.3927-100000@ashi.FootPrints.net><Pine.LNX.4.10.10008142321530.3927-100000@ashi.FootPrints.net><200008151604.JAA32408@bromo.med.uc.edu><200008151849.LAA32590@bromo.med.uc.edu><200008151951.MAA32632@bromo.med.uc.edu><3999B6E3.151AB054@ivey.uwo.ca>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

"Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca> writes:

> Should the symbol getrlimit64 version GLIBC_2.1 be present in glibc 2.1.92?

Yes.  We changed a lot in this area and you are the first to try this.
PPC is really a really badly supported platform since Geoff does not
have any time for it.  I'll try to look at it but it's in the moment
not high on my list.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.1.92 compatibility with glibc 2.1.3 ?
  - From: Franz Sirl

References:
- Re: problem in aio_notify.c in glibc 2.1.92?
  - From: Kaz Kylheku
- glibc 2.1.92 compatibility with glibc 2.1.3 ?
  - From: Kevin B. Hendricks

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]