This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: 2.1.92 does not compile
>>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes:
Uli> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
>> Should we tell people to use 3.79 or newer? In that case we should
>> change the configure script and the documentation.
Uli> I don't have the old versions anymore so requiring make 3.79 and up is
Uli> probably safer. So the patch is OK except for
>> Index: configure.in
>> --- configure.in 2000/07/21 04:04:37 1.284
>> +++ configure.in 2000/08/09 06:17:27
>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@
>> critic_missing=t)
>> AC_CHECK_PROG_VER(MAKE, gnumake gmake make, --version,
>> [GNU Make[^0-9]*\([0-9][0-9.]*\)],
>> - [3.75 | 3.76.[1-9]* | 3.7[789]* | 3.[89]*], critic_missing=t)
>> + [3.75 | 3.79* | 3.[89]*], critic_missing=t)
>>
>> AC_CHECK_PROG_VER(MSGFMT, gnumsgfmt gmsgfmt msgfmt, --version,
>> [GNU gettext.* \([0-9]*\.[0-9.]*\)],
Uli> Why do you want to allow 3.75?
I've removed 3.75 there now - I considered leaving it in because it
was old enough to not use the buggy routines ;-).
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj