This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Use of LC_ALL vs. __LC_LAST
- To: Bruno Haible <haible at ilog dot fr>
- Subject: Re: Use of LC_ALL vs. __LC_LAST
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
- Date: 24 Jul 2000 11:52:18 -0700
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <14716.28284.691342.611201@honolulu.ilog.fr>
- Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)
Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> writes:
> It seems that when categories were added after LC_ALL, not all uses of LC_ALL
> were changed to __LC_LAST. The following patch fixes this in two places:
Thanks, I've applied the patch.
--
---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------