This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc-2.0.99 & linux 2.1.125/2.1.126
- To: John Kennedy <jk@csuchico.edu>
- Subject: Re: glibc-2.0.99 & linux 2.1.125/2.1.126
- From: Alex Buell <alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 14:35:01 -0500 (EST)
- cc: alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk, libc-alpha@cygnus.com, ragnar@lightside.ddns.org
- Reply-To: alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk
On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, John Kennedy wrote:
> Using 2.1.126 and 2.0.99 failed in the now-usual place on my build too.
> Since you're beating that bush, I'll try 2.1.126 & 2.0.98 (given that
> 2.1.125 & 2.0.98 built just fine & worked on my box).
Installing 2.0.99 on 2.1.125 works fine, and rebooted into 2.1.126 and all
seems to be well.
> [Ragnar Hojland Espinosa]
> > ... I bet my head it's because the binfmt_elf patch in 2.1.126
>
> I'll have to try to reverse that if/when the 2.1.126+2.0.98 build fails.
This is probably the problem. I'll dig out the patch and eyeball it.
Cheers,
Alex
--
/\_/\ Legalise cannabis now!
( o.o ) Grow some cannabis today!
> ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.
http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk - *new* - rewritten for text browser users!
Linux tahallah 2.1.126 #59 SMP Sat Oct 24 11:46:13 EDT 1998
Two Intel Pentium Pro processors, 331.78 total bogomips, 48M RAM
System library 2.0.99