This is the mail archive of the guile@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Bad define placement?


Richard Frith-Macdonald <richard@brainstorm.co.uk> writes:

> On 27 Aug 1999 16:07:45 +0200, mdj@mdj-pc.nada.kth.se wrote:
> > >From R5RS:
> >
> > "Definitions may occur at the beginning of a <body> (that is, the body
> > of a lambda, let, let*, letrec, let-syntax, or letrec-syntax expression
> > or that of a definition of an appropriate form)."
> 
> Sorry if this is a foolish question but ...

No foolish question.

> Does that include the beginning of a (begin...) too?

No.

> If I remember correctly, a begin is supposed to be rewritten internally by
> the system as a letrec,

No, a begin is not normally rewritten.

> so I'd have thought that a define should be legitimate there and
> possibly in other places as well.  Is there a definative reference
> document on the web that I should be looking at?

The definitive reference on Scheme is R5RS which you can find at

  http://www.cs.indiana.edu/scheme-repository/doc.standards.html

The definitive part of the definitive R5RS is the formal syntax and
semantics at the end of the document.  :)

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]