This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: GSL containers (switched sparse format to binary trees)
- From: Gerard Jungman <jungman at lanl dot gov>
- To: gsl-discuss at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 15:59:06 -0600
- Subject: Re: GSL containers (switched sparse format to binary trees)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <535DAFC0 dot 8090402 at colorado dot edu> <535ED7A5 dot 7020309 at lanl dot gov> <535EFCA5 dot 8050807 at colorado dot edu> <CAFoZWWg9ENCX0cxNBMGJLc9AxT0Tt2a9yaBq7NctcLLK4jLeVA at mail dot gmail dot com> <535FFA33 dot 90604 at lanl dot gov> <53600311 dot 7040805 at colorado dot edu> <53602290 dot 8020309 at lanl dot gov> <53629696 dot 7070907 at colorado dot edu> <5362D6E1 dot 5080605 at lanl dot gov> <5362F944 dot 9090408 at lanl dot gov> <5362FB2A dot 7090608 at lanl dot gov> <5363B395 dot 5060101 at colorado dot edu>
On 05/02/2014 09:02 AM, Patrick Alken wrote:
Anyway, Gerard, you have a good grasp of the various issues and what
needs to be done about it - would you be interested in taking the lead
on this and designing a nice API for user-defined alloc functions?
Sorry for the late reply; I had a busy week.
I will start looking into this. I also want to do some research
on the various problems people may be having with the containers,
notably the various "performance" tests where GSL containers and/or
linear algebra come out badly. It's been a while since I've seen
these sorts of comparisons, but they are out there somewhere.
--
G. Jungman