This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GSL v2.0 discussion

From: Patrick Alken <patrick dot alken at Colorado dot EDU>
To: gsl-discuss at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:07:07 -0600
Subject: Re: GSL v2.0 discussion
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <533EE354 dot 4050204 at colorado dot edu> <533EE585 dot 40301 at colorado dot edu> <CAKDqugQuLsj71+PbEYM8RUhrHpTZKiEed0svWbaDK=kFv0Yp4g at mail dot gmail dot com> <533F1BA7 dot 5020003 at colorado dot edu>

On 04/04/2014 02:52 PM, Patrick Alken wrote:

I need to look into whether lapack2flame accepts LAPACKE calls or just
LAPACK calls (I don't see any reference to LAPACKE in the flame user
manual). In any case, lapack is usually installed by default on many
systems, whereas lapacke is probably not, so it may be worth supporting
lapack instead.

Looking into this further it seems LAPACKE is included by default inrecent lapack installations, which is very nice. I like how LAPACKEsupports both row/column major matrix inputs - it seems this would makethings much easier for us and we still might be able to use lapack2flameby linking with -llapacke but not -llapack?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GSL v2.0 discussion
  - From: Rhys Ulerich

References:
- GSL v2.0 discussion
  - From: Patrick Alken
- Re: GSL v2.0 discussion
  - From: Rhys Ulerich
- Re: GSL v2.0 discussion
  - From: Patrick Alken

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]