This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the GSL project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Help-gsl] Spearman rank correlation coefficient


Thanks for your input!

1) Here is the text of the license under which the Apache code is:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0. Indeed it seems that we
would have to indicate their copyright. Is this a problem? In a way,
there is not a lot of different algorithms to compute the Spearman
coefficient...

2) I have made the changes and now have "gsl_stats_spearman_alloc" and
"gsl_stats_spearman_free" functions for the four arrays ranks1,
ranks2, d and p. I added the code as a 2nd file to the same gist:
https://gist.github.com/1784199#file_spearman_v2.c

3) Yes, we don't know in advance how many ties there will be. That's
why I reallocate inside the loop. I don't see how I can do
differently.

4) I added a function performing tests, using the data defined in
statistics/test_float_source.
c. What do I do now? Do I need to have write access to the GSL
repository on Savannah? Or maybe someone else can do it for me?

Thanks,
Tim


On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Patrick Alken
<Patrick.Alken@colorado.edu> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> ÂIt would be best to move this discussion over to gsl-discuss. I think it would be very useful to have this function in GSL. Just a few comments on your code:
>
> 1) The code looks clean and nicely commented. One issue is that since you appear to have followed the apache code very closely, there may be a licensing issue - I don't know if the Apache license is compatible with the GPL. On a quick check, its possible we can use it but it seems we need to preserve the original copyright notice.
>
> 2) Dynamic allocation - it looks like you dynamically allocate 5 different arrays to do the calculation. It would be better to either make functions like gsl_stats_spearman_alloc and gsl_stats_spearman_free, or to pass in a pre-allocated workspace as one of the function arguments. Since you're using workspace of different types (double,size_t), its probably better to make the alloc/free functions.
>
> 3) One of your dynamically allocated arrays is realloc()'d in a loop. Is this because the size of the array is unknown before the loop? Perhaps there is a way to avoid the realloc's.
>
> 4) We also need to think of some automated tests that can be added to statistics/test.c to test this function exhaustively and make sure its working correctly - even if that consists simply of known output values for a few different input cases.
>
> Good work,
> Patrick Alken
>
>
> On 02/09/2012 04:26 PM, TimothÃe Flutre wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed that only the Pearson correlation coefficient is implemented
>> in the GSL (http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/manual/html_node/Correlation.html).
>> However, in quantitative genetics, several authors are using the
>> Spearman coef (for instance, Stranger et al "Population genomics of
>> human gene expression", Nature Genetics, 2007) as it is less
>> influenced by outliers.
>>
>> Current high-throughput data requires to compute such coef several
>> millions of times. Thus I implemented the computation of the Spearman
>> coef in GSL-like code. In fact, one just need to rank the input
>> vectors and then compute the Pearson coef on them. For the ranking, I
>> got inspired by the code from the Apache Math module.
>>
>> I was thinking that it could be useful to other users to add my piece
>> of code to the file "covariance_source.c" of the GSL
>> (http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/gsl/trunk/annotate/head:/statistics/covariance_source.c#L77).
>> So here is the code: https://gist.github.com/1784199
>>
>> I am not very proficient in C, so even if it is not possible to
>> include the code in the GSL, don't hesitate to give me advice.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]