This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view)

From: Brian Gough <bjg at gnu dot org>
To: Gerard Jungman <jungman at lanl dot gov>
Cc: GSL Discuss Mailing List <gsl-discuss at sourceware dot org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:56:02 +0100
Subject: Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view)
References: <48E25CA9.6080306@iki.fi><490DE4BD.7070907@iki.fi><m3y700znqd.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk><497B00F6.2080400@iki.fi><m38woqp3je.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk><498727E5.6080407@iki.fi><49AA9DB5.6030908@iki.fi><49FB01D1.30000@iki.fi><m3ljp7amw3.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk><4A7ADFDC.9080408@iki.fi><m3r5v4527i.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk><1251414774.23092.80.camel@manticore.lanl.gov><1251414939.23092.82.camel@manticore.lanl.gov><m37hwapzfk.wl%bjg@network-theory.co.uk><1253062147.23092.970.camel@manticore.lanl.gov>

At Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:49:07 -0600,
Gerard Jungman wrote:
> I really don't understand this. In my head, I can see a solution
> which has nothing to do with const-ness issues. I think it would
> just work. I could type it in and we could look at it. It definitely
> involves changing the way vector and matrix are done, but I don't
> think it would be a big hairy deal.

If you can make a simple concrete implementation of how it could work
that would help a lot.

References:
- GSL 2.0 roadmap
  - From: Tuomo Keskitalo
- Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap
  - From: Brian Gough
- Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap
  - From: Gerard Jungman
- Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view)
  - From: Gerard Jungman
- Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view)
  - From: Brian Gough
- Re: GSL 2.0 roadmap (one man's view)
  - From: Gerard Jungman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]