This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: GSL test release 1.12.90
Brian Gough wrote:
> At Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:49:56 +0100,
> Brian Gladman wrote:
>> I had two compile errors:
>>
>> 1. I found declarations after executable statements in test_funcs.c
>> (spring_f)
>>
>> 2. In gsl_const_cgs.h, the MSVC preprocessor does not recognise the
>> #warning directive.
>
> Thanks for the testing.
>
>> The test that fails is testrandist, which gives this output in 64-bit mode:
>>
>> GSL_IEEE_MODE="double-precision,round-to-nearest,mask-all"
>> FAIL: test gsl_ran_exponential [0,1]
>> (0 observed vs 0.393469 expected) [7]
>>
>
> Thanks - it looks like the header file <gsl/gsl_math.h> is missing in
> randist/exponential.c for gsl_log1p.
Yes, that fixed it. Thanks Brian.
Brian Gladman
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4344 (20090818) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com