This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:56:58 +0000 Brian Gough <bjg@network-theory.co.uk> wrote: > You need e.g. GSL_IEEE_MODE="double-precision,mask-all" ... to avoid > floating-point exceptions raising an unhandled SIGFPE signal. > It should work with "mask-all". Indeed it works with extended and double precision, while with GSL_IEEE_MODE="single-precision,mask-all" make check I obtain (with the 1.5 stable version too) FAIL: gsl_fdiv(2,3) (0.666666686534881592 observed vs 0.66666666666666663 expected) FAIL: test Is this as expected? G. -- Giulio Bottazzi PGP Key ID:BAB0A33F
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |