This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: intel/debian/unstable/2.2.17 failures
- To: Mark Galassi <rosalia at galassi dot org>
- Subject: Re: intel/debian/unstable/2.2.17 failures
- From: Brian Gough <bjg at network-theory dot co dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:19:54 +0100 (BST)
- Cc: GSL discussion list <gsl-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- References: <761yxweiq6.fsf@dongiovanni.lanl.gov>
The monte failures are known problems -- so far I have not turned them
off as I thought it would be the wrong approach to get rid of a
warning without finding the cause
Changing
for (num_dim = 1; num_dim < 10; num_dim++)
to
for (num_dim = 1; num_dim < 9; num_dim++)
would be sufficient
The specfunc failure looks like the error estimated by the function is
slightly too small -- also not critical, although maybe Jerry will
increase the error estimate slightly.